One Hard Hat, Four Men

Some of the folks I spoke to around Ohio were natural story tellers. One of them was George, an autoworker in Toledo. For almost two hours he reveled in walking me through his three and a half decades as an employee of Chrysler. More than once, he made me laugh to tears. As I work on his story, I have to share one of his anecdotes, told to me with passion and pride.

George would not stand for being put in danger at work. That adamancy lost him his job during his first year with Chrysler, 1977. Back then he was working on Jeep Cherokee tailgates, which hung by hooks overhead the workers. Each tailgate weighed about seventy pounds, and a jerk in the line could cause the hooks to break, sending those bulks of metal tumbling down onto the men below. George, with the innocent audacity of a novice, demanded that a safety cage be put in place. Management handed over a hard hat. There were four men.

Some days later a tailgate fell, landing six inches in front of George, “boom!” George was set off. He shut down the line, nailed his union card to the wall, and declared he would only retrieve the card and resume working if and when the situation was addressed. The plant manager asked George if he was refusing to work. When George replied that indeed he was, the manager called in a replacement. George, emboldened beyond containment, picked up his hammer and threatened that “anyone who’s gonna come do this job is gonna go through this hammer!” Security guards swept in and escorted him out of the building.

Witnesses to the episode, George’s fellow workers initiated a wildcat strike. They informed the management that if the safety issue were not properly addressed by the following week, they would not come back to work. That weekend, seventy-five feet of safety cage were put up. The men went back to work. Three months later, George did too. He had taken his case to the National Labor Relations Board, received back pay, and particularly enjoyed the posting of a public apology on the bulletin boards in the plant for ninety days.

A Memory on Memorial Day

Memorial Day implores us to remember fallen soldiers. And we shall. Yet that remembrance will always be incomplete, because a life lost is a tragedy worsened by the silence it creates. Dead soldiers cannot tell us their stories. They cannot recount the details of their final moments, nor the thoughts that coincided. We cannot know if they sensed fear, shock, anger, surrender, loneliness, relief, all of these, none of these. Which loved ones warmed their hearts before the cold settled in? Which enemies tortured their minds before oblivion? We shall not know.

Surviving soldiers can share their stories. Death lives in these tales too. It’s depravity damages all sides in war. It can settle into the mind even when the body endures. It haunts. On Memorial Day, let us remember that.

Born and raised in Ohio, Sergeant Rogers has been in the US Army for over 26 years, first on active duty, and then as both a member of the Reserve and as a civilian unit administrator. His father was in the Army for over three decades, and he would be happy to see his 14-year-old daughter join the military too (though preferably Air Force over Army). I am keeping Rogers’s real name and location private, as per his request. I only regret that I cannot name the stunning surroundings of his duty location. I will say this: there is a beauty particular to an industrial landscape. It is the antithesis of natural scenery, yet commands a glory no less. It is perhaps offensive to environmental sensibilities, yet nostalgic of days passed. A rugged river runs through, watering not trees but grand towers of steel and smoking stacks. Like Roger’s story, it is a past that Ohio cannot shed.

Rogers was deployed more than once during his career, the latest time to Iraq as a medic. For nearly an hour, he spoke to me of those deployments in fond terms, demonstrating a sense of pride in a duty fulfilled. Only in the last moments of our conversation did he begin to hint at that which haunts. This was Sergeant Rogers’s story:

I experienced a man dying in my arms. He was Iraqi, but they were all just people. I still see his face every night, and it’s hard to get to sleep sometimes. That led me to drinking. I’m trying to quit. I haven’t had a drink in 23 days. You see, the other medics were asking him personal questions. And I’ll never forget the answers. “Six daughters.” He had six daughters, all under 14 years old. 

It was a negligent fire incident. It was meant to be a warning shot. As far as I’m concerned, we murdered him. Those personal questions… it was alright until then. 50-caliber, hit the ground, recoiled so the second round went straight through the vehicle. I drank a lot, just to sleep. Some people go the VA or Army, they say you have PTSD. With my position here, if I told an Army psychologist, I’d get graded a three as a psychological, so I wouldn’t be able to keep both jobs.

We were on a convoy in a very dangerous area near Baghdad. We got caught in a traffic jam. Horrible to be sitting duck, everybody’s nervous. The two Iraqis in the vehicle, maybe had brake problems. The kid fired warning shot which he wasn’t supposed to do. One guy in the vehicle survived, but lost his arm. The other shot that hit the ground went up through the vehicle into his groin. We weren’t supposed to fire ANY warning shots. 

I knew he was going to die. Not a day goes by though, I think “what more could I have done?” Maybe that is the medic in me. Maybe if I tried harder. But really, the energy of a 50-caliber, going through the groin and out the arms. Everything would be hamburger in between. It was amazing he was even answering those questions. 

Thank you for sharing, Sergeant Rogers.

Full Disclosure

I have lately been putting together the stories of the young people I have spoken with around Ohio, and wanted to share some personal reflections. 

I cannot compose this chapter without considering my own circumstances, and also feeling compelled to provide a full disclosure. I am only one year older than Meggan and Arianna. Like them, I am trying to find my way academically and professionally, and have yet to secure myself financially. I have also surpassed the average ages of marriage and childbirth, and am in no rush to catch up with my cohort. Just like Meggan, I work on a part-time basis while transitioning to graduate school and am not paying rent thanks to the hospitality of my parents. Unlike both of them, my choices have been made under privileged circumstances. Nevertheless, these choices were also intimately connected to the recession.

My parents, Syrian immigrants, determined that the old world should not be far from our upbringing in Cleveland. Politics and culture rarely came in separate lessons; one realizes that a country’s cuisine, for instance, cannot be appreciated without knowing that politics itself has the power to put food on the table. Inspired by the quotidian yet profound nature of politics, I made it the focus of my studies. I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in political science from American University in 2008, fortunately debt-free. Yet that year, my peers can tell you, was just about the worst time one could be tossed into the job market. I quickly recognized that my very expensive degree was not going to open many doors, and least of all to the intellectually engaging jobs I had in mind (and frankly, I did not have much of a skill set for more ‘practical’ work). With the encouragement and financial support of my parents, I decided to make use of the next year by moving to Syria and studying Arabic, promising to enroll in graduate school upon my return.

On the side of my language studies in Damascus, I volunteered as an English instructor for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees. In the alleyways of the dilapidated refugee camp I worked in, my perspective on politics shifted away from the institutions and structures of power I learned about in college, and towards the reception of that power among the people. In other words, I became interested in politics from below. That interest carried me toward pursuit of a Master of Arts in Arab studies at Georgetown University (graduate school as promised, but not law school as per my father’s pleas). In the course of my graduate studies, I learned to ask probing questions about the political realities I had witnessed, and to develop methods for seeking answers.

In between my two years of study, I had the unexpected, but highly welcomed, opportunity to take a year off to assist my professor in establishing the Middle East Institute of the National University of Singapore. There again I witnessed several captivating phenomena, including a government relentlessly implementing policies to promote and maintain high standards of living for the middle class, and an economy dependent upon (but a population largely unwelcoming of) millions of migrant laborers. These two topics alone fill volumes. Ultimately, I wondered most about the dissonance between the rising middle classes in the developing world, and the stagnating and even declining standards of living of most Americans (noting that income disparities pervade all capitalist economies, and increasingly so in Asia). I wondered if Americans felt something happening to the American dream.

After returning from Singapore and completing my degree at Georgetown, I graduated into a slightly improved economy holding a higher degree than before. But now I was too driven by my experiences to subject myself to an office environment (a privileged sentiment, surely). I wanted to understand – and, ideally, relate – the impact of overriding economic and political structures on folks on the ground, especially in the wake of the Great Recession. My home state of Ohio – with its diverse economic sectors, political moderation, large population, painful history of de-industrialization and ongoing reconfigurations for the modern economy – seemed to possess a larger American story.

Setting out on my journey around the state, I again made a promise (to myself this time) to return to graduate school. At the time of writing, I have accepted an offer, with funding, to study for my PhD in political science. In this pursuit, I am knowingly embarking on a path far less privileged than I have known heretofore. Indeed, higher education has been suffering for years from decreased government funding, strapped budgets, and increasing competition. Since the crash in 2008, 48 states have cut funding to higher education and, in turn, academic positions – especially tenured ones – are increasingly eliminated from university ranks.[1] Stories of PhD-holders on food stamps abound, and countless more statistics and studies demonstrate decreasing job and economic security for academics. The same economic processes dogging the people in these pages will impact me as well.

Fortune has facilitated my ascent, but I’m taking it from here.


[1] Phil Oliff, Vincent Palacios, Ingrid Johnson, and Michael Leachman. “Recent Deep State Higher Education Cuts May Harm Students and the Economy for Years to Come.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 19 March 2013. Link here.

Baffled Pill: Why We Are Killing Ourselves

I published a piece on the Huffington Post that offers a glimpse into the confusion and contradictions dogging our healthcare system and how we approach it. 

Last month, Steven Brill published an article, “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us,” which directed national attention to our health care system in a more serious way than has been the case since the 2009 debates over the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). It was a nuanced, comprehensive, and thoughtful account of a broken system. Yet unlike many political issues, health care is one that impacts all of us, all the time, whether or not politicians and pundits are addressing it. Every day, people live, suffer through, survive, and die in the health care system. Read the rest here!

Swing State Sorrows: The Price of a Vote that Matters

My latest article, now up on the Huffington Post, discusses the impact of Ohio’s centrality in the national elections on our state’s political culture.

We hear it time and again, enviously, bitterly, admiringly, coaxingly. It may be our sole characteristic that induces jealousy among our compatriots. It entices the world’s most powerful men to court us. Observers from Beijing to Benghazi eye us intently; from New York to California they unabashedly ogle us. We are awash — maybe drowning — in the money of millionaires. Here in Ohio, our votes matter.

By November 7, we will have determined the course of the domestic and foreign policies of a global superpower. Very soon thereafter all will forget us, and then in four years wonder again why we are so fickle. In the meantime, we will be left to attend to our wounds. Maybe we will mend them, but probably they will fester. All that is certain is that no entity could be so torn and embattled without suffering critical damage. Read the rest here! 

Let’s Disagree to Agree? Romney, Obama, and the Foreign Policy Debate

Some reflections on the final presidential debate of 2012 for Aslan.

During the final presidential debate of the 2012 campaign season, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and Democratic president-and-candidate Barack Obama frequently found themselves in agreement on major foreign policy issues. Although the agreements were more apparent than in the past, thanks to the recent emergence of “Mitt the Moderate,” they could have been anticipated. When Michael Hudson and I wrote about the candidates’ stances on issues related to the Middle East, we found Mitt Romney’s stances to be vague, critical and bellicose, but largely indistinct in specifics. His philosophy may well be “speak ambiguously and carry a big stick.” Read the rest here!

The Secretary’s Setback: The Polls Will Stay Open in Ohio

In my latest piece on the Huffington Post, I talk about the early voting saga in Ohio with Ohioans themselves.

The battle over early voting in Ohio might, finally, be over. The crusader for limiting voters’ access to the polls, Secretary of State Jon Husted, took a fatal blow from the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday. They declined to hear his appeal of the decision of lower courts that favored keeping the polls open the weekend before the November 6 election. The unelected justices-for-life did democracy a favor. Read the rest here!